Journal of Business Research, June At the same time, there may be drawbacks that come with the financial windfall. The authors conduct two studies to explore how sports betting affects fan engagement — the emotional connection fans have with their favorite teams. The first study included people recruited from Mechanical Turk and focused on betting on a team to win, also called moneyline betting.

Prop bets are bets made on the outcome of some action during the game — whether the next foul ball is caught, missed or goes into the stands, for example.

The study is among the first to explore whether there are negative emotional responses from fans related to sports betting. Participants read a scenario — they were to imagine watching a Major League Baseball game, then randomly they were told they placed either no bet on the game or one of several types of bets.

Gaming experts, according to the authors, contend that prop bets can potentially keep fans engaged even if the outcome of the game is obvious — if a team is up by 10 runs by the middle innings, for example.

In each study, the participants were asked questions to gauge their emotional investment before and after being told the outcome of the game and their bets. Questions broadly asked about team loyalty, feelings of connectedness to the team and the likelihood participants would watch the team or attend a game, along with other measures of fan engagement.

The findings: In the short run, immediately after a game, the study indicates that betting and losing can decrease fan engagement. Participants who placed no bet were more likely to exhibit loyalty and purchase team-branded merchandise when the team lost, compared with those who placed a moneyline bet.

Those who won a prop bet were slightly more likely to be engaged with the team than those who did not bet — but those who lost a prop bet were much less engaged than those who did not bet.

Instead, we find that when fans lose a bet, positive emotions and subsequent fan engagement decrease. College Football Referee Bias and Sports Betting Impact Rhett Brymer, Ryan Rodenberg, Huimiao Zheng and Tim Holcomb. Eastern Economic Journal, January The study: The authors explore whether betting lines are related to bias in officiating in the six major Division I college football conferences across 6, games from to Betting lines indicate whether a sportsbook thinks a game will be close, will favor one team or the other, or be a blowout.

sports in which conferences have primary managerial responsibility for officials. They use penalty yards per game as a proxy for whether an officiating crew exhibits bias toward one team or the other.

The findings: The authors find signs of bias during in-conference games in two conferences: the Atlantic Coast Conference and the Big East, which reorganized in and no longer sponsors football. In-conference games are those where two teams from the same conference play each other.

In those ACC games where there one team was favored to win by three touchdowns or more, the authors find officials call 6.

In the Big East, the penalty yards increase to 5. Further, ACC officials appeared to flag fewer penalty yards against teams that had been in the league longer and enjoyed historic success, rather than newer teams enjoying more recent success.

The authors found no officiating bias when an out-of-conference opponent was heavily favored. Increased fan engagement via legal sports wagering highlights the importance of pinpointing evidence of bias and undertaking measures to ensure unbiased officiating and game integrity. Legalized Sports Betting, VLT Gambling, and State Gambling Revenues: Evidence from West Virginia Brad Humphreys.

The study: In one of the only studies to examine state-level sports betting revenue after the Supreme Court ruling, Humphreys looks at sports betting tax revenues in West Virginia and whether gamblers shifted their wagering from video lottery terminal games in casinos to sports betting.

The findings: From September to December , casinos in West Virginia introduced five new sportsbooks, one at each of its licensed casinos.

The state taxes video lottery revenues at While new revenue streams from legalized sports betting appear attractive on the surface, states already generate substantial tax revenues from gambling, and the introduction of sports betting to this mix does not leave spending on other forms of gambling untouched.

Ernest Goss and Peyton Miller. University of Illinois Law Review, October The study: Another one of few papers to examine how tax revenues and the games bettors played changed after the ruling, the authors analyze what happened after Iowa allowed sports gambling after August Iowa casinos that offer sportsbooks pay 6.

The authors do not look at the specific effects of sports betting on other types of gambling, but rather whether there were any changes in overall revenues after August The findings: Mobile sports betting and sports betting in casinos did not affect statewide gambling revenues from August to March After March, casinos shuttered due to the COVID pandemic.

Conditions within the state of Iowa may limit the applicability to other states. For example, the varying tax brackets across gambling forms differ from casino taxing in other states.

Frameworks of Gambling Harms: A Comparative Review and Synthesis Virve Marionneau, Michael Egerer and Susanna Raisamo. Addiction Research and Theory, August A framework in this context refers to a way of categorizing and thinking about an issue with an ultimate goal of understanding the issue in a comprehensive way and finding solutions.

While not specifically related to sports betting, the frameworks explored in the paper are useful for those who want to better understand what can happen to individuals and families affected by problem gambling. After searching major academic research databases, the authors settled on seven papers published between and that developed an original harm framework related to problem gambling — four of the papers focused on developing the same framework, leaving four frameworks total.

The authors, while applauding the research that has already been done, note that further research is needed. The findings: Two of the frameworks discussed problem gambling harms related to the workplace and personal relationships. One framework separated psychological and cultural harms, and harms related to crime.

Further incorporation of social and societal harms is still needed to conceptualize and operationalize gambling as a public health issue. This includes the development of societal-level harm measurement and harm minimization. Americans have a long tradition of gambling. College of the Holy Cross economist Victor Matheson recounts in a January article in the Eastern Economics Journal:.

States began to relegalize gambling on horse racing in the s as a method of economic stimulus during the Great Depression. For more than 30 years, the Wire Act , enacted in September , was the only federal law that addressed sports gambling.

The law prohibits the use of a wire — a phone, or, more recently, the internet — to transmit information about placing sports bets across state lines. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which became federal law in , allowed federally recognized Native American tribes to operate casinos on their land.

Sports betting in tribal-run casinos, however, was not allowed unless a tribal-state compact was signed. This is the root of the current legal dispute in Florida. Such compacts were in effect in 22 states as of June , according to the International Center for Gaming Regulation at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

By the early s, federal legislators were expressing moral panic over the possibility of states allowing sports betting within their borders, to take advantage of billions being wagered illegally.

Illegal transactions are, by nature, difficult to track. People who bet illegally and their bookies do not typically share receipts with the government or trade groups, so it is difficult to say with precision how big the illegal gambling market was before It is an oft-repeated figure in news stories and on websites devoted to sports betting.

The moral erosion it produces cannot be limited geographically. Once a state legalizes sports gambling, it will be extremely difficult for other States to resist the lure.

The current pressures in such places as New Jersey and Florida to institute casino-style sports gambling illustrate the point. Without federal legislation, sports gambling is likely to spread on a piecemeal basis and ultimately develop an irreversible momentum.

Professional sports league commissioners and former athletes were publicly and adamantly against legal sports betting.

They objected that sports integrity would be irreparably harmed, including the possibility of fixed games. That is not our product. That is not the product we are selling. President George H. Bush signed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act on Oct.

It went into effect on Jan. Bettman became commissioner of the National Hockey League a month later — and, eventually, a fan of sports betting. After , some limited sports betting was grandfathered in Delaware, Oregon and Montana.

In this season, ten players were suspended for sports gambling, seven of which suspended indefinitely because they bet on the NFL. These are the dangers that come with the legalization of sports betting.

Leagues are now on the lookout for this as they have had to implement stricter measures to prevent players and personnel from trying to fix games and participate in other forms of corruption.

To combat this issue, the NFL is reexamining how they educate players and personnel on their gambling policy. A new directive the NFL established this year increases the education provided to young players entering the league.

With more people participating in sports gambling and player-specific betting, athletes are now facing more unnecessary scrutiny and hate than ever before. This happened in the NBA last season when former Washington Wizard and now Phoenix Suns guard Bradley Beal was confronted by a disgruntled fan who had just lost a bet.

Beal responded by saying that he was just doing his job and that he takes what he does very seriously. Beal then turned and swatted towards the man, knocking off his hat. There was a police investigation, but no charges were filed. With the increase of people gambling and placing player-specific bets, more of these situations are likely to occur.

So far, there have been no regulations or consequences enacted by the NBA or any other leagues when it comes to fans verbally attacking players for their losing bets, but it's something leagues may consider moving forward.

As it expands, its effect on the sports industry will continue to grow alongside it. Its popularity is undeniable; sports betting adds a new dimension to how people engage with the game by maximizing fan experience and deepening fan involvement.

More leagues may tighten regulations in the future to combat these issues, but only time will tell how this new development changes the landscape of the sports industry. For Athletes For Brands Athlete Roster Brand Case Studies Media Athletes Defined Podcast Merchandise Connect Careers.

September 29, Sports Betting Legalization: What Its Big Impact Means for Sports. By Jason Martini Athelo Group. Stay in the loop. Enter your email to sign up for the Athelo Group newsletter.

Athletes Brands Brand Case Studies Media Merchandise Connect.

One of the most important advantages of sports betting is the increase in the amount of money brought in the form of taxes. Sports betting In conclusion, legalizing sports gambling in the US could have a positive economic impact due to increased tax revenue, job creation, and We expect the primary effect of sports betting would be to shift existing sports betting activity from illegal to legal markets, and that very little

Video

Benefits of legalizing sports betting - Job creation. The legalization of sports betting in the US has had a positive impact on the economy, particularly in terms of job creation One of the most important advantages of sports betting is the increase in the amount of money brought in the form of taxes. Sports betting In conclusion, legalizing sports gambling in the US could have a positive economic impact due to increased tax revenue, job creation, and We expect the primary effect of sports betting would be to shift existing sports betting activity from illegal to legal markets, and that very little

This revenue could be used to fund infrastructural projects in different sectors as well as public services, which would create employment for citizens.

These figures demonstrate just how much of an impact sports betting can have on employment opportunities and economic growth in the US. Home » Partner Content » Exploring the economic impact…. Partner Content Bazoom June 13, , AM.

Share This: share on facebook share on twitter share via email print. Listen now to WTOP News WTOP. com Alexa Google Home WTOP App This content is provided by Bazoom. Promotes tourism Sports betting has significantly boosted the tourism sector, which has had a positive effect on the US economy.

Increased government revenue One of the most important advantages of sports betting is the increase in the amount of money brought in the form of taxes. Employment Sports betting has had a significant economic impact on the US, particularly in terms of employment.

This new approach relies on the idea that when people place a bet, they have a financial stake in the game and are more likely to closely follow it. The results speak for themselves: NFL viewership has increased every year since the legalization of sports betting.

In , the NFL pulled in an average of With more states beginning to legalize sports betting, these numbers will continue to rise. Major League Baseball is another league reaping the benefits. The sports betting surge is also enhancing the fan experience.

To meet demand, stadiums have begun incorporating sportsbooks that are connected to the venue for fans to place bets before, during, or after the game. This concept is new in the sports world and is starting to grow. Before sports betting was legalized, fans would go to a game, buy a beer, and watch from their seat.

Now fans are able to visit kiosks in the stadium to place bets mid-game, or they can go sit in the sportsbook and watch their bets with other fans. Millennial fans have long awaited this enhancement, considering back in over half of this demographic believed on-site sportsbooks would improve the fan experience.

While sports betting legalization positively impacts the industry, it does come with some drawbacks—such as its impact on the integrity of the game. In this season, ten players were suspended for sports gambling, seven of which suspended indefinitely because they bet on the NFL.

These are the dangers that come with the legalization of sports betting. Frameworks of Gambling Harms: A Comparative Review and Synthesis Virve Marionneau, Michael Egerer and Susanna Raisamo. Addiction Research and Theory, August A framework in this context refers to a way of categorizing and thinking about an issue with an ultimate goal of understanding the issue in a comprehensive way and finding solutions.

While not specifically related to sports betting, the frameworks explored in the paper are useful for those who want to better understand what can happen to individuals and families affected by problem gambling.

After searching major academic research databases, the authors settled on seven papers published between and that developed an original harm framework related to problem gambling — four of the papers focused on developing the same framework, leaving four frameworks total.

The authors, while applauding the research that has already been done, note that further research is needed. The findings: Two of the frameworks discussed problem gambling harms related to the workplace and personal relationships. One framework separated psychological and cultural harms, and harms related to crime.

Further incorporation of social and societal harms is still needed to conceptualize and operationalize gambling as a public health issue. This includes the development of societal-level harm measurement and harm minimization.

Americans have a long tradition of gambling. College of the Holy Cross economist Victor Matheson recounts in a January article in the Eastern Economics Journal:.

States began to relegalize gambling on horse racing in the s as a method of economic stimulus during the Great Depression. For more than 30 years, the Wire Act , enacted in September , was the only federal law that addressed sports gambling. The law prohibits the use of a wire — a phone, or, more recently, the internet — to transmit information about placing sports bets across state lines.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which became federal law in , allowed federally recognized Native American tribes to operate casinos on their land.

Sports betting in tribal-run casinos, however, was not allowed unless a tribal-state compact was signed. This is the root of the current legal dispute in Florida. Such compacts were in effect in 22 states as of June , according to the International Center for Gaming Regulation at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

By the early s, federal legislators were expressing moral panic over the possibility of states allowing sports betting within their borders, to take advantage of billions being wagered illegally.

Illegal transactions are, by nature, difficult to track. People who bet illegally and their bookies do not typically share receipts with the government or trade groups, so it is difficult to say with precision how big the illegal gambling market was before It is an oft-repeated figure in news stories and on websites devoted to sports betting.

The moral erosion it produces cannot be limited geographically. Once a state legalizes sports gambling, it will be extremely difficult for other States to resist the lure. The current pressures in such places as New Jersey and Florida to institute casino-style sports gambling illustrate the point.

Without federal legislation, sports gambling is likely to spread on a piecemeal basis and ultimately develop an irreversible momentum. Professional sports league commissioners and former athletes were publicly and adamantly against legal sports betting.

They objected that sports integrity would be irreparably harmed, including the possibility of fixed games. That is not our product. That is not the product we are selling. President George H. Bush signed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act on Oct.

It went into effect on Jan. Bettman became commissioner of the National Hockey League a month later — and, eventually, a fan of sports betting. After , some limited sports betting was grandfathered in Delaware, Oregon and Montana.

Delaware, for example, allowed a certain type of bets on National Football League games. States were given one year to legalize casino sports betting after the federal law went into effect, but none did. Nevada was the only grandfathered state that fully allowed sports betting.

For nearly three decades, the federal legislation enshrined Las Vegas as the U. sports betting hub. You go to the counter, you place a bet and you watch the game on 50 different screens. Constitutional cracks emerged in the s. In , New Jersey legislators voted to reverse their law banning sports betting there.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association brought the state to court. This was the case the Supreme Court heard years later, leading to the fall of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act.

Major sports leagues today are on board with gambling. It is impossible to watch professional sports without encountering advertisements encouraging betting.

Aside from accepting ad dollars from sportsbooks, every major sports league and numerous individual teams have lucrative partnership deals with sportsbooks. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Email.

Republish This Article.